A Review of Technology Acceptance Models and Theories
Abstract
In the contemporary world, technology and information systems are perceived as mandatory aspects for many organisations and companies to attain their goals. Thus, several technology theories and models have been formulated and adopted in various fields to increase the usage of technology. Many studies have adopted different models and theories to examine the factors that can affect and lead to the successful utilisation of technology. Therefore, through a critical review of the literature, the current study aims to critically discuss the strengths and limitations of some of these technology acceptance models, namely technology acceptance model, theory of reasoned action, unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and extended technology acceptance model. Based on the review, this study illustrates that no theory is free from limitations and that each theory has both strengths and weaknesses. This study offers future researchers an opportunity to adopt a suitable model for performing their empirical studies with different technologies.Index Terms—TAM, TRA, UTAUT, technology, technology acceptance model, theory of reasoned action.References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Al-Aulamie, A., Mansour, A., Daly, H., & Adjei, O. (2012). The effect of interinsic motivation on learners' behavioural intention to use e-learning systems. In 2012 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).
Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S., & Wang, J. (2007). Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Information & Management, 44(8), 681-691.
Al-hawari, M. A., & Mouakket, S. (2010). The influence of technology acceptance model (TAM) factors on students'e-satisfaction and e-retention within the context of UAE e-learning.Education, Business and Society , Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues.3(4) , 299-314.
Al-hawari, M. A., & Mouakket, S. (2010). The influence of technology acceptance model (TAM) factors on students'e-satisfaction and e-retention within the context of UAE e-learning.Education, Business and Society , Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues.3(4) , 299-314.
Bousbahi, F., & Alrazgan, M. S. (2015). Investigating IT Faculty Resistance to Learning Management System Adoption Using Latent Variables in an Acceptance Technology Model. The Scientific World Journal.
Brezavšček, A., Šparl, P., & Žnidaršič, A. (2014). Extended Technology Acceptance Model for SPSS acceptance among Slovenian students of social sciences. Organizacija, 47(2), 116-127.
Cheng, C. H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European journal of operational research, 142(1), 174-186.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology , a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology , a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dillon, A., & Morris, M. G. (1996). User acceptance of new information technology: theories and models. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
Henderson, R., & Divett, M. J. (2003). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(3), 383-395.
Hussein, R., Aditiawarman, U., & Mohamed, N. (2007). E-learning acceptance in a developing country , a case of the Indonesian Open University. In German e-Science Conference.
Jong, D., & Wang, T. S. (2009, May). Student acceptance of web-based learning system. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Web Information Systems and Applications (WISA’09) (Vol. 8, pp. 533-536). People's Republic of China: Nanchang.
Lai P. C. & Zainal A.A, (2015). Perceived Risk as an Extension to TAM Model: Consumers’ Intention To Use A Single Platform E-Payment. Australia Journal Basic and Applied Science, 9(2): 323-330.
Lai, P. C. (2016). Design and Security impact on consumers' intention to use single platform E-payment. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 22(1), 111-122
Lai, P. C. (2017). THE LITERATURE REVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION MODELS AND THEORIES FOR THE NOVELTY TECHNOLOGY. JISTEM-
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning , An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 61, 193-208.
Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in human behavior, 21(6), 873-891.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173-191.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173-191.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173-191.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.
Nguyen, T. T. H., Nguyen, N., Nguyen, T. B. L., Phan, T. T. H., Bui, L. P., & Moon, H. C. (2019). Investigating consumer attitude and intention towards online food purchasing in an emerging economy: An extended tam approach. Foods, 8(11), 576.
Samaradiwakara, G. D. M. N., & Gunawardena, C. G. (2014). Comparison of existing technology acceptance theories and models to suggest a well improved theory/model. International Technical Sciences Journal (ITSJ), 1(1), 21-36.
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of consumer research, 15(3), 325-343.
Shih, Y. Y., & Fang, K. (2006). Effects of network quality attributes on customer adoption intentions of internet banking. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(1), 61-77.
Simon, B. (2001). Wissensmedien im Bildungssektor. Eine Akzeptanzuntersuchung an Hochschulen (Doctoral dissertation, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business).
Tarhini, A., Arachchilage, N. A. G., & Abbasi, M. S. (2015). A critical review of theories and models of technology adoption and acceptance in information system research. International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), 6(4), 58-77.
Teo, T. (Ed.). (2011). Technology acceptance in education. Springer Science & Business Media.
Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model , Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Yousafzai, S. Y. (2012). A literature review of theoretical models of Internet banking adoption at the individual level. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 17(3), 215-226.
